According to developer Bart Knuiman (also from the WANDER team), the complexity of the data is still a challenge: "A Digital Twin provides insight into what is possible, but it does not allow you to predict the future directly. For example, visualizing wind in relation to turbulence is more complicated than it seems. The same goes for crowd simulations; that also involves psychology, for example, which is not a hard science." This begs the question; is accuracy the goal? Or is it about that that the Digital Twin displays data more insightfully? This may depend on the application.
I see a lot of motivation and willingness in the industry to share what has already been created, but because of a lack of overview, we often fail to find each other.
There is already a lot of literature on how to create an effective Digital Twin. The team has therefore made use of this. According to Thomas, collaboration is key, though. "Some are reinventing the wheel. It's still such a young field, so that's not crazy either, but it's still a waste of time and money. I see in the sector a lot of motivation and willingness to share what has already been created, but because of a lack of overview, it often fails to find each other. So at the organizational level there is a lot of room for improvement."
Source: https://wander.wur.nl/xr-projects/tree-pollen